Click on image for list of posts |
Social Technology--The Effective, The Questionable
Some of the best and worst applications of social and mobile media and associated technologies
Saturday, January 2, 2016
Best of 2015 from Global Voices
Global Voices is an interesting site with content on a variety of sites all over the world.
It is worth following for insights from different perspectives.
Friday, May 1, 2015
Creative Infographics Focus on Tragedy
Tragedies around the world have generated powerful social media. This is one of a series of infographics that chronicle the destruction in Yemen.
The author, Ruba Aleryani, is a Yemeni student at Brown University who has chosen social media to give expression to the suffering of her country. I read about it on Global Voices, a global newsletter worth following,
You can follow Ruba on Twitter @raleryan where the extent and the creativity of her activism is apparent.
Monday, January 12, 2015
Votes are In! Mobile is Leading Marketing Trend for 2015
And since digital is increasingly driving overall marketing strategy, mobile will indeed have a pervasive influence this year.
What is really important is that mobile is more than devices, it is more than a platform. Some have described it as a “layer,” which in an IT sense seems applicable. It has also been suggested that mobile is so important that it is a strategy. Thinking about it, I have decided that the best term is “ecosystem.” That’s not a new description, but it seems to mostly be used by techs talking about systems, not marketers talking about strategy. Geoff Ramsey of eMarketer calls mobile the “Swiss Army Knife” of marketing.
1. Mobile-first marketing strategies. Many experts agree on the importance of putting mobile first when developing marketing strategies. So many people consume so much content on mobile—and an increasing number are connected to the Internet only by mobile—that the mobile experience is taking center stage.
2. Video will be the content of choice. MarketingProfs.com says that the video play button will represent the most compelling call to action for marketers. Video creates a compelling presence on mobile for brands that use it creatively in pursuit of their strategy.
3. Apps increase role as favored access for consumers. Much of consumers’ mobile time is spent on apps, not on the Internet. That makes apps more important for marketers who can use them in ways that are targeted, personalized and an integral part of the consumer decision journey. Some will go along on that journey as wearables.
4. Mobile payments will take off. Payment systems are more available, more widely accepted by retailers and easier to use. The danger in this one is a hack that destroys consumer confidence in the systems.
5. Connectivity will grow. Connected cars and houses have become reality. The “Internet of Things” will have a large impact on daily life and the way consumers view products and brands.
The Outcome—Omnichannel Consumer Experience Takes Center Stage. As mobile permeates all channels—from communications, to retail, to ecommerce—the omnichannel experience will be increasingly defined by the mobile experience. That makes the totality of consumer experience critical to brand success. And creating seamlessly excellent customer experience across many online and offline channels is difficult.
I hope you’ll also find these in-depth resources useful and that you will add your comments and insights on this look ahead to 2015!
From Silverpop
From TopRank blog
From Social Media Examiner blog
From Mashable
My mobile customer experience presentation
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Curation Contributes to Amazing Instagram Account
According to Mashable one government agency, the Interior Department, has Instagram figured out. This image is of the super moon in late June. "Beautiful photo of the #Moon over #TurretArch in #Arches National Park last night." Take a look at their Instagram account and marvel at the images that document the natural beauty of the United States.
Don't the images make you want to visit some of these places? And maybe
submit a photo to their summer contest (2013)?
Notice that the contest is posted on the White House blog. Interior has
a news page, but I don't find a blog. The White House would probably
have more followers anyway!
Huff Post calls it "an impressively well-curated Instagram account." Director of Digital Strategy Tim Fullerton explained some of their practices to Mashable.
Their Instagram page has over 200,000 followers at present, another testimony to the power of the channel. And their social media concentration on Instagram suggests a good understanding of the channels available.
First posted July 1, 2013. Updated March 11, 2014.
Huff Post calls it "an impressively well-curated Instagram account." Director of Digital Strategy Tim Fullerton explained some of their practices to Mashable.
Their Instagram page has over 200,000 followers at present, another testimony to the power of the channel. And their social media concentration on Instagram suggests a good understanding of the channels available.
First posted July 1, 2013. Updated March 11, 2014.
Monday, March 3, 2014
Are Non-Profits Using Social Media Strategically?
I recently pinned an infographic with data about foundation use of social media platforms. It is interesting, but not surprising. Selected data from the infographic shows that:
Facebook is the most popular platform by a considerable margin. Note that blogging was not included as a platform even though my guess is that it is widely used.
The majority of foundation users of social media do not have a formal strategy.
That's unfortunate, because a majority think social media is useful in several respects.
A recent study of non-profit organizations showed similar results. Facebook, used by 82% of the responding non-profits, was far and away the most popular. Twitter came in second with only 54% of using the platform. This study asked about blogging and that found only 32% have blogs while 48% host online discussion forums, which is an interesting juxtaposition.
Two things strike me. The first is to wonder whether Facebook is most used for its strategic value or for its familiarity. If it is a platform favored by the target audience of the non-profit, that's good. If it's a platform with which non-profit marketers are themselves familiar, that makes the choice questionable.
The second is to wonder about the nature of use of social platforms. Facebook and Twitter are excellent for announcements--programs and events, for example. Relatively little use is being made of platforms which convey in-depth information--blogging and YouTube as two good examples.
Non-profits need to make the best use of their resources, which are often scarce. Non-strategic use of social media is certainly not a best practice.
Facebook is the most popular platform by a considerable margin. Note that blogging was not included as a platform even though my guess is that it is widely used.
The majority of foundation users of social media do not have a formal strategy.
That's unfortunate, because a majority think social media is useful in several respects.
A recent study of non-profit organizations showed similar results. Facebook, used by 82% of the responding non-profits, was far and away the most popular. Twitter came in second with only 54% of using the platform. This study asked about blogging and that found only 32% have blogs while 48% host online discussion forums, which is an interesting juxtaposition.
Two things strike me. The first is to wonder whether Facebook is most used for its strategic value or for its familiarity. If it is a platform favored by the target audience of the non-profit, that's good. If it's a platform with which non-profit marketers are themselves familiar, that makes the choice questionable.
The second is to wonder about the nature of use of social platforms. Facebook and Twitter are excellent for announcements--programs and events, for example. Relatively little use is being made of platforms which convey in-depth information--blogging and YouTube as two good examples.
Non-profits need to make the best use of their resources, which are often scarce. Non-strategic use of social media is certainly not a best practice.
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Boston Strong and the 100% Model
Bostonians rushed in to help in the wake of the devastating
explosion that ripped through the festivities at the finish of Boston Marathon
on April 15, 2014. Bystanders aided the wounded, storekeepers offered shelter,
and first responders ran toward the chaos. Others of us simply sat in front of
our TVs, watching in horror as events unfolded.
As the day went on it became clear that many of the injuries were
extremely serious and would require multiple surgeries and long-term
rehabilitation.
The philanthropic response was a model in several ways. Boston
had a 5-term mayor and Massachusetts had a 2-term governor who took quick
action. The next day they announced The One Fund to aid victims. Their names
lent credibility as did the involvement of large Boston firms like John
Hancock. By the end of the week a simple website was up, accepting donations
but warning that the organization had not yet applied for 501(c)(3) status;
that is only now in process. All the publicity surrounding the fund emphasized
that administrative costs would be covered by separate fundraising with all
donations going directly to victim assistance—the 100% model.
Responses have been many and varied—from the Boston Strong t-shirts
sold by Emerson College students to a fund-raising concert to many efforts in
social media. Twenty million dollars was raised within the first week. In July
2013 the fund was able to distribute almost $61 million to victims under the
direction of well-known mediator Kenneth Fineberg. Another distribution is
planned for this July. In the meantime, the first Boston Marathon to be held
since the bombing will include a One Fund charity team. Many private
fundraising events are anticipated.
To the best of my knowledge no whiff of corruption has been
attributed to the fund itself—no mean feat for a hastily assembled effort. Of
course, it brought out the scammers but from an outside perspective it seemed
this was expected and swiftly dealt with. The fund appears to have raised over
$70 million to date.
Writing in the Able Altruist blog Stephanie Kapera lists 5 lessons from this success:
- Act Quickly
- Leverage Online Influencers
- Use a Multi-Channel Approach
- Use Hashtags
- Use Visuals.
Does the success of The One Fund support both the importance
of the 100% model and the speeding up of the fund-raising cycle? Probably. It also
may support the difficulty of maintaining the 100% model. A recent announcement
said that the salary of the new executive director of the fund would be paid from donations.
Any success has imitators and smaller charities can’t match
the personal leverage of Boston’s power structure. This was recently brought
home to me when I donated to a small non-profit. I was asked to add a small
additional percentage to cover administrative costs. The platform was
YouCaring., which says it remains free because administrative costs are
covered by donations.
This was totally transparent and the extra amount was
editable and optional. To me, however, it is not truly an example of the 100%
model.
Thinking about it, I wonder if the lesson is that the model is
best sustained by a single, often charismatic, individual not by a
somewhat-faceless organization. Charity:water remains true to the model, but it
is not clear that many others do.
Does anyone have direct experience with or thoughts on the subject?
Friday, February 21, 2014
Creativity is Indispensable in Social Media Too
Here's an interesting tweet from a UNICEF campaign in the UK. Matt Rhodes from
Fresh Networks retweeted it, saying it's at the edge of social media. It was a UK campaign; I did not ever see it in the US.
I agree. It's a compelling call to action, and a reminder of the limits of social media.
Or is it a reminder of the reach of social media?
Either way, it is definitely creative fund raising!
If you are interested in creative campaigns in social media, here is a recent list, all of which have thought-provoking aspects.
First published on April 23, 2013. Updated February 21, 2014.
I agree. It's a compelling call to action, and a reminder of the limits of social media.
Or is it a reminder of the reach of social media?
Either way, it is definitely creative fund raising!
If you are interested in creative campaigns in social media, here is a recent list, all of which have thought-provoking aspects.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)